By Steve Newton
Earlier today I posted a blog about how incredibly lame the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame is for not yet inducting Johnny Winter and Rory Gallagher.
But now that I’ve had a few more hours to seriously consider how bogus the Rock Hall is, I’ve got another bone to pick with the high-and-mighty types who keep disrespecting the greatest rock ‘n’ rollers of all time.
How the hell did Judas Priest get nominated before Iron Maiden?
Don’t get me wrong, I like Priest a lot. Since 1982 I’ve interviewed the band seven times. But are they really more worthy of induction than the mighty Maiden?
I think not.
That’s why I inducted Iron Maiden into Newt’s Rock Hall back in 2015.
The true measure of a rock ‘n’ roll band–or in this case, heavy metal act–is its live performance. I’ve seen both Priest and Maiden several times, and it’s pretty clear to me that Maiden is the stronger act in concert.
I’m talking about during each band’s ’80s heyday.
I’ll admit that it’s hard to pick a clear winner between the guitar teams of Adrian Smith/Dave Murray and Glenn Tipton/K.K. Downing, but Bruce Dickinson had way more energy than Rob Halford, and was more entertaining overall.
Clive Burr and Nicko McBrain blew Dave Holland away behind the drumkit, and I think it’s pretty obvious which group had the better bass player.
Recording-wise, Maiden have released 16 studio albums, Priest 17. (Apparently Maiden has sold several million more copies, but who cares.) But I don’t think you can decide which band is more deserving of Rock Hall recognition by comparing the albums, because for every Number of the Beast there’s the same year’s Screaming For Vengeance; for every Powerslave there’s the same year’s Defenders of the Faith; for every Somewhere in Time there’s the same year’s Turbo.
You get the idea.
So I’ve gotta judge the two great British metal bands by what I’ve witnessed on stage over the years, and to me that puts Maiden on top.
What say you?